this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
85 points (98.9% liked)

In Person Activism

244 readers
5 users here now

"Power wants your body softening in your chair and your emotions dissipating on the screen. Get outside. Put your body in unfamiliar places with unfamiliar people. Make new friends and march with them." -Tim Snyder

A community for sharing information about ways to get involved with real world activism to make the world a better place.

Spend less time arguing about politics on the internet. The world is in trouble. Get out there and try to help.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Was this a case of jury nullification? You love to see it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Says the jury found them not guilty. Sounds like it comes down to them being instructed not to consider the bulk of the prosecution’s evidence.

[–] hellothere 8 points 2 months ago

Not quite, it was the defence's arguments that they were ordered to not consider

During the trial, Judge Sellers ruled that none of the defence’s three arguments would be allowed for the jury to consider. Despite this, the 12 member jury made a factual determination and found all three defendants not guilty.

So yea, nullification.