this post was submitted on 30 May 2024
57 points (90.1% liked)

Canada

7081 readers
196 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Regions


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Canadian real estate prices have surged in almost every market, with a typical home price doubling in many regions. A median household in major cities like Toronto and Vancouver would need to save over 20 years for just the down payment, more than 3x the historic average. Seems absurd? The outlandish scenario was apparently a […]

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why the fuck would he say this right now.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Because he knows he lost and now he's trying to leave the biggest mess possible to smear the next party

PP will win by doing nothing and then we are seriously in for a world of hurt

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Hmm. Polling as the Conservatives are, would they win against a united left? I've suggested a strategic exit from three-way races on here before, but maybe that's not even enough.

There's also a US election between now and then.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The Liberals would rather lose than be part of meaningful progressive coalition.

Even the current situation is unpleasant for them, as exemplified by how grudgingly they'll deliver even the meanest social program.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It doesn't even have to be a coalition. They could pull out of some ridings unilaterally, and might want to if it guarantees another minority government.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I mean I hope not, but I think they would win if there was an election today

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Because he knows conservatives are coming, and this is yet another futile attempt to cater to these devils before election

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He's primarily after the youth vote. I'm not sure which "devils" you mean exactly, but young people don't usually own a home.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

By "devils" he means property investors, bankers and in general the kinds of people that donate to parties and give board seats and reciprocal business arrangements to politicians.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

It could be, but this benefits all homeowners, and ordinary ones make up the most politically important block, which is why I'm unclear. OP could mean anything from all homeowners (the edgey take) to just the billionaire ones.