this post was submitted on 16 May 2024
601 points (97.9% liked)

Technology

59105 readers
4009 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 15 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I use things that work

Blowing leaves around instead of removing it, isn't ideal then.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Leafblowers are used to collect it into a pile which is then raked/shoveled into a bin. The blower is much faster and less effort than the rake at collecting everything into the pile.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Everyone I see using them merely uses it to blow the detritus into the street. What you’re saying makes a lot of sense, but people don’t do that

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

Yeah, well, you can't fix stupid.

Although if there isn't that much, I suppose letting it dry and break down in the local environment is better than putting it in a landfill. If there's a lot of it, then at least in cities I've lived in, they can and do ticket for putting yard waste or shoveling snow in the street.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

No, that's what a rake does.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Do you think a leaf BLOWER sucks leaves up or does anything but blow them wherever you point the machine?

Your thinking of a leaf vacuum which the article is NOT referring too...

What was the point of your reply, I really don't get it..