Cybersecurity

5968 readers

222 users here now

c/cybersecurity is a community centered on the cybersecurity and information security profession. You can come here to discuss news, post something interesting, or just chat with others.

THE RULES

Instance Rules

Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
No Ads / Spamming.
No pornography.

Community Rules

Idk, keep it semi-professional?
Nothing illegal. We're all ethical here.
Rules will be added/redefined as necessary.

If you ask someone to hack your "friends" socials you're just going to get banned so don't do that.

Learn about hacking

Hack the Box

Try Hack Me

Pico Capture the flag

Other security-related communities [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected]

Notable mention to [email protected]

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

kid

[email protected]

Backlogs at National Vulnerability Database prompt action from NIST and CISA (www.csoonline.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/cybersecurity

1 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A crisis at the key US service for ranking vulnerabilities has been fueled by short resources and an explosion of security flaws as the volume of software production increases.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] taladar 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

This article seems full of people in deep denial about the fact that the whole scoring and prioritizing aspect takes significantly more effort than fixing the vulnerabilities and is only of interest to the kind of large corporation who wants to use old versions (i.e. wants to be selective about which changes to an upstream project they use) but who isn't willing to pay for the extra effort.