this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2024
2346 points (99.5% liked)

Memes

45902 readers
1593 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 179 points 8 months ago (5 children)

If only, I know so many people who don't bother with adblocking at all. I honestly have no idea how they use the Internet without going mad

[–] [email protected] 212 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (4 children)

My kid discovered that he can hit the "report" button on the YouTube app on the TV to skip the ads immediately. So now every ad gets reported as "inappropriate".

I'm proud of him.

[–] [email protected] 85 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Tip: if you have an Android TV, you can install SmartTube as an alternative, privacy-friendly YouTube client. It has no ads and sponsorblock integration

[–] [email protected] 21 points 8 months ago (3 children)

And as a better option, use an actual device instead of a short lifecycle planned obsolescence embedded android device on a "smart" tv.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

This is why I refuse to buy a "smart" TV. My old flat screen TV works perfectly fine with a Chromecast with Google TV. I can even use the Chromecast in my projector or any other device with HDMI input to make it smarter than most TV interfaces I have tried.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

My cheapo dumb tv died a couple of years back, was a great bit of kit for $400au that gave me 10 years. I've got a "smart" tv at the moment which isn't connected to the internet, and just serves as the display for my Shield TV.

I'd probably consider an LG commercial / signage display as my next device, some old work connections can get me one as a special purchase through their distribution channels it's just waiting out the current panel dying.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I do the same, I use kodi on a CoreElec box on my 10 year old dumb TV. It works great, but my issue is it's going to be extremely difficult to replace my TV when it gets time to upgrade. (Eg, if I want to move to an OLED, or QD panel). Every new TV on the market is a smart TV. It's getting to the point that you need to buy a very large monitor, rather than a TV, to achieve the same setup.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

At least the Chromecast with Google TV (HD) is cheap.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

AndroidTV also exists on Chromecast devices...
AndroidTV is not exclusive to TV manufacturers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

There's also Playlet for Roku users, which is an Invidious client.

[–] UnRelatedBurner 2 points 8 months ago

thanks for the link.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago

I found out this trick when I eating dinner once at my local library. Oddly, it was a kid came up and saw I was watching YT videos. Showed me the tactic, and now I rely on it lol

[–] [email protected] 0 points 8 months ago

I just stay logged out of youtube. So far no ads and no nagware

[–] [email protected] 42 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I'm of two minds about people not adblocking.

On one hand: Ads are gross noise pollution, and people are increasingly unaware of all the noise around them (or the noise they're generating) largely because they've been passively trained to "tune out" ads. Also consumerism.

On the other hand: As long as there are a significant amount of people oblivious to the possibility of adblock, corporate ad mobsters and the other worst people in the world out there will largely leave those of us blocking their ads alone. If everyone ran adblockers, we'd definitely live in a world of WEI... and probably worse. So, maybe all those people are watching ads so that I don't have to, as the YouTube thumbnails say.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If sites wanted to run ads and host them locally without tracking that would be fine. But since they're tracking users it's essential to block them for privacy and security, and if someone isn't then maybe they don't understand the level of tracking involved. We need a better name than adblocking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

I just don't want to see ads.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

Sure, that should be absolutely your choice, it's your browser.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

People just don't know, I've been showing my wife the way little by little and she's always blown away

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago

I've shown a colleague after seeing him browse an horrendous fantasy football website. He couldn't believe the difference between before and after.

[–] JulesTheModest 13 points 8 months ago

Yeah, it's shocking to see how many ads they jam in now. I felt so dirty.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I also don't understand it. But now I am wondering if we would not have had those "careless" (indifferent ? ignorant ?) millions of people not blocking ads then Google and others may have started pushing anti-adblock measures years earlier, no ?