this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2024
48 points (96.2% liked)

Canada

7185 readers
500 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Universities


πŸ’΅ Finance / Shopping


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Companies received approval to fill around 240,000 positions in 2023 – more than double what was permitted in 2018

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] xmunk 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That is a fair sounding consideration - I think we'd want to look at the knock on effects but it doesn't sound terrible as a compromise... in general though, having a separate system for temporary work just lowers worker empowerment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

The TFW program needs major reform to make it not remotely cost competitive with hiring local. There should be 3 scenarios that all these companies fall under: 1. Bring in someone temporarily while local training is underway (this should be the most attractive route). 2. The work assignment is shorter than the amount of training required, the requirement is legitimately so specific that training isn't practicable, or any other short term temporary requirement (this should be so expensive that it will be an actual last resort and can't possibly undercut anyone local). or 3. If the person is so crucial to your day to day operations they should be sponsored for permanent residency.