this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
27 points (59.2% liked)

Unixporn

15467 readers
50 users here now

Unixporn

Submit screenshots of all your *NIX desktops, themes, and nifty configurations, or submit anything else that will make themers happy. Maybe a server running on an Amiga, or a Thinkpad signed by Bjarne Stroustrup? Show the world how pretty your computer can be!

Rules

  1. Post On-Topic
  2. No Defaults
  3. Busy Screenshots
  4. Use High-Quality Images
  5. Include a Details Comment
  6. No NSFW
  7. No Racism or use of racist terms

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The Wikipedia definition seems to indicate it has origins as a racist term and I've never understood why unix users have adopted this terms instead of something benign like "themes" or "theming" which I remember being in use long before I ever heard "rice". So what gives? Why use "rice" instead of "theme"?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are plenty of articles and comments out there from disabled people recounting how that word has been weaponized against them. When people are telling us this, it seems pretty tasteless to continue using it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I have no idea why I get downvoted every time I say this. If there are a large number of people out there saying 'I was called this name due to my disability, it makes me feel like shit, and the fact that a popular FOSS project continues to use it despite being told this time and time again makes me feel that the FOSS community sees me as less than human' how is it remotely complicated to have the common courtesy to apologize, pick a better name, and carry on? This is not hard, it costs nothing, and it's just basic human respect.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Following that logic we should rename lots of things, as any word can be use in a despicable way. I get your point. But again. It's just the name of an app.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Following that logic we should rename lots of things, as any word can be use in a despicable way.

Any word CAN be, but in this case you have a group of people telling you it IS hurtful to them. Those aren't the same thing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The word has been considered a serious slur for years. If, by chance, you wind up naming your project with a tier-1 slur, yes, you should absolutely rename it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Gimp is one of the few FOSS projects with some notoriety outside of tech circles. It, VLC and Linux are possibly the only names I could expect some random person to have heard of. Changing its name would probably torpedo years of work to become seen as a reliable piece of software and send it back to the realm of "software that only people who watch the code repository know about".

And the whole changing the name to avoid offending someone is a losing battle in the first place. According to this thread, "rice" is potentially racist. I had no idea anyone could find "Gimp" offensive, but apparently they can. By this point, it's part of american internet culture to be offended and no word is safe from americans turning it into a slur, dog-whistle, etc etc and advocating that everyone else in the world should stop using it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The fact that g--p is a slur is not a new thing. It's the equivalent of f----t or r----d for a large number of disabled people, and has been for years. The fact that you did not know this doesn't make it any less true.

Do you honestly believe a name change would vault the project into obscurity? Seems like a quick press release would do it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

When I hear gimp outside of the context of the software, I think of gimp suits. In my area I've never heard gimp used as a slur for disabled people.

I get that there's regional slang and what not, but if every word that offended anyone anywhere was banned, we would have to limit our words to the point of barely being able to communicate.

In my area, depending who you are, a silly term as "goof" is offensive. I almost got beat up for calling a guy one as a joke. Should I petition Disney to rename Goofy?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

if every word that offended anyone anywhere was banned...

I'm hearing this point a lot, but it just makes clear that people aren't reading or understanding my other remarks. This isn't a random word that someone decided was offensive. This is a slur that is well known to large number of disabled people. They have been telling us this for some time. You haven't heard it used that way? That's great, but that also doesn't mean that it isn't. You know who does know what slurs are used against them? The people who are targeted by them. I'll bet there are plenty of slurs you haven't heard of that are, in fact, still slurs regardless.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, I find the name Nathan really offensive.

Are you going to do something about it?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Have you got any real arguments for me?

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's an acronym, just that. We can argue is a misfortune one but that's it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Yea, it's an acronym that spells out a slur. It should be changed.