this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
24 points (92.9% liked)
UFOs
2681 readers
3 users here now
This community is for discussion surrounding UFOs and Extraterrestrials.
Rules
- Be your own moderator
- Think before you post or comment, and use your common sense about what is acceptable. This is a community space and should ultimately be community-driven. Be the community you want to see here.
- If you are here because you want to make fun of or grandstand over all of the silly people who believe that UFO/UAPs may exist, you are not welcome. Just block the community and go about your day.
- Be Civil
- No trolling or being disruptive.
- No insults or personal attacks.
- No accusations that other users are shills/agents. If you have some kind of evidence of this, please report instead.
- No hate speech or abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.
- No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.
- No witch hunts or doxxing.
- No summarily dismissive comments (e.g. "Swamp gas.").
- Posts must be related to UFO/UAPs
- Avoid duplicate posts
- Link posts should contain the linked content and a submission statement
- Submission statements should contain a summary of the content, why it is relevant to UFOs, and optionally personal perspectives.
- For short-form content, such as tweets, include the entire text.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I feel like they're going to release some very ancient, very unsatisfying reports and a few fuzzy videos and claim that's all they ever had. I hope not, but I'm skeptical this is as revelatory as it seems.
They used the word disclosure 79 times in this document. It being proposed by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is significant, he’s already said “I am honored to carry on the legacy of my mentor and dear friend Harry Reid and fight for the transparency that the public has long demanded surrounding these unexplained phenomena.”
I think this is the big one, especially when there’s language like this in the amendment
I think everything will be a drip. The fact that there is tightly controlled language on disclosure in a real bill being discussed should not be understated.
It might just go as you claim, however it will be far from over. Keep in mind, this renewed interest from Congress has been spurred by the fact that they have been deceived for a very long time. If Congress don't get anything substantial from this, I can't see them being ok with it. They might deem it too damn scary to be made fully public in which case we will only see the ancient grainy things.