this post was submitted on 10 Apr 2024
12 points (80.0% liked)

Europe

8324 readers
1 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out [email protected]

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hopefully this is seen as a more unbiased source.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"What's unfortunately happened for these young people is that because of the toxicity of the debate, they've often been bypassed by local services who've been really nervous about seeing them," Dr Cass said.

"So rather than doing the things that they would do for other young people with depression, or anxiety, or perhaps undiagnosed autistic spectrum disorder, they've tended to pass them straight on to the Gid service."

"There are few other areas of healthcare where professionals are so afraid to openly discuss their views, where people are vilified on social media, and where name-calling echoes the worst bullying behaviour," she said.

Her report added that the "exceptional" toxicity has had a negative impact on the quality and availability of evidence.

There's nothing objectionable or controversial in this article, yet it's getting downvoted to heck. Good object example of how legitimate discussion of the topic is being suppressed

[โ€“] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's a sensitive subject that's hard to talk about. Humility and compassion, as well as a will to listen to understand, is needed by everyone involved.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It indeed is. Why is an article of scientists discussing children's welfare marked NSFW?

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

Why is an article discussing children's welfare down-voted to oblivion? I don't think that's how down-votes are supposed to be used. However, I put it as NSFW because I knew it would be sensitive and I wanted to give fair warning.