this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
471 points (84.3% liked)

linuxmemes

20483 readers
1093 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In the case of Arch the backdoor also wasn't inserted into liblzma at all, because at build time there was a check to see if it's being built on a deb or rpm based system, and only inserts it in those two cases.

See https://gist.github.com/thesamesam/223949d5a074ebc3dce9ee78baad9e27 for an analysis of the situation.

So even if Arch built their xz binaries off the backdoored tarball, it was never actually vulnerable.

[โ€“] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

I just know there is a lot of uncertainty. Maybe a complete wipe is a over reaction but it is better to be safe