Technology

1453 readers

158 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.

Rules

1. English only

Title and associated content has to be in English.

2. Use original link

Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.

3. Respectful communication

All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.

4. Inclusivity

Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.

5. Ad hominem attacks

Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.

6. Off-topic tangents

Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.

7. Instance rules may apply

If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.

Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Backdoor found in widely used Linux utility breaks encrypted SSH connections (arstechnica.com)

submitted 8 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Malicious code planted in xz Utils has been circulating for more than a month.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 24 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (2 children)

In some cases, the backdoor has been unable to work as intended. The build environment on Fedora 40, for example, contains incompatibilities that prevent the injection from correctly occurring.

It’s really funny that it’s package incompatibilites that saved us.

There’s a joke that I can’t find now about how hard it is to install a virus in Linux even if you try.

[–] atkion 24 points 8 months ago (1 children)

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

That’s it! Thank you!

Transcription:

Downloaded a virus for Linux lately and unpacked it.

Tried to run as root, didn’t work.

Googled for 2 hours, found out that instead of /usr/local/bin the virus unpacked to /usr/bin for which the user malware doesn’t have any write permissions, therefore the virus couldn’t create a process file.

Found patched .configure and .make files on some Chinese forum, recompiled and rerun it.

The virus said it needs the library cmalw-lib-2.0. Turns out cmalw-lib-2.0 is shipped with CentOS but not with Ubuntu. Googled for hours again and found an instruction to build a .deb package from source.

The virus finally started, wrote some logs, made a core dump and crashed. After 1 hour of going through the logs I discovered the virus assumed it was running on ext4 and called into its disk encryption API. Under btrfs this API is deprecated. The kernel noticed and made this partition read-only.

Opened the sources, grep’ed the Bitcoin wallet and set $5 out of pity.

[–] themoonisacheese 4 points 8 months ago

You know how "the most stable ABI on Linux is win32"? I wonder if there are already win32 viruses targeted at linux, shipped in cracked games for example.