this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
1446 points (99.5% liked)

196

16423 readers
1948 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1446
rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

FAQ

Q: why not organize and stop treating the bus as a legitimate entity? why aren’t you working to stop the bus?

A: do both. cut the fuel line. break windows. put oatmeal in the gas tank. but maybe your efforts don’t succeed this election cycle. and if so don’t fucking throw away your vote if it can help your neighbors fucking survive. “harm reduction” is not a political strategy for action. it is a last minute, end of the line decision to save lives, after all other resources have been exhausted.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

this is straight up election misinformation. a vote for any candidate may only be voted for that candidate, and it can't be discarded.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So you think Kennedy or the other candidates are likely to get more votes than Trump and Biden?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

no, but that's not what i said, either.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

…and you think in a FPTP system voting for someone who is very unlikely to win isn’t effectively the same as voting “whatever”? What’s the difference?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

the difference is that voting "whatever" is the same as not voting. by contrast, voting for a candidate is voting... for that candidate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So the difference is for one you have to waste your time to achieve the same result?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

it's not the same result. in one scenario, the vote total doesn't change. in the other, a candidate gets one more vote.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So you don’t care who wins but want to increase voter turnout?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

of course i care who wins. i want my candidate to win. that's why i vote for them.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

And you already admitted it’s unlikely that’s going to happen.

I’d also like to become a millionaire, but that doesn’t mean spending all my money on slot machines makes sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

it's the right thing to do. ends don't justify means.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You’re just letting perfect be the enemy of good. And while unfortunately “good” is not really that good, the alternative is way too dangerous to risk it over moral principles. It’s sad, but as long as FPTP stays in place the only correct choice is to vote for the “least bad” of the main two.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

voting for bad people is bad. it's not that I'm letting perfect be the enemy of the good. im letting good be the enemy of bad.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I mean, do whatever you want, it’s clear you’re not going to change your mind. Just keep in mind that if Trump wins, you also contributed to that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

no, i didn't. biden won in 2020 and i voted for howie. am i allowed to take credit for that? it makes no sense.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

You contributed to that by not voting for Trump, yes. That’s FPTP.

It absolutely makes no sense but it’s the system in place and there’s pretty much nothing people can do about it short of overthrowing the government.