[Outdated, please look at pinned post] Casual Conversation

253 readers

1 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.

RULES

Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling
Encourage conversation in your post
Avoid controversial topics such as politics or societal debates
Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate
No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc.
Respect privacy: Don’t ask for or share any personal information

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

150

Would you be in favour of assisted dying being introduced for terminally ill patients in your country? (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

92 comments fedilink hide all child comments

With the discussion of whether assisted dying should be allowed in Scotland befing brought up again, I was wondering what other people thought of the topic.

Do you think people should be allowed to choose when to end their own life?

What laws need to be put into place to prevent abuses in the system?

How do we account for people changing their mind or mental decline causing people to no longer be able to consent to a procedure they previously requested?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

With a waiting period, I think assisted dying should be available for adults in general, regardless of terminal illness.

No one opted in, and at least in my society where we are belligerently unwilling to tangibly help one another, where most are expected to endlessly produce regardless of our wellbeing under threat of homelessness and gruesome death by exposure, and where struggling people are often condemned for being lazy or making bad decisions when they're already down, it would be a small, efficient mercy to allow a quiet, painless opt out.

We could even have the capitalists run it and charge a small fee since they need to turn everything into a for profit endeavor. Everyone wins.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I was with you until the capitalists part ad that would incentivize abuse and overuse for malicious reasons.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What, don’t you want to pay for an assisted suicide subscription? Look at all the options! We’ve unbundled it so you can get the basic plan with a DIY bottle of Benzos, our mid tier with a caregiver that can assist, and our top tier at our Aid in Dying facility with a nurse on standby. You can even add packages like flowers, snacks for the family, and even carting service to the funeral home. Subscribe now and get 50% off your first death!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

you have selected slow and horrible

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

you have selected slow and horrible

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

jokes on you i prefer invidious

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

They're the biggest reason assisted dying would be so popular, regardless of how it was run.

This is their world, and they must benefit to permit something merciful for the people to happen. Their malice is already everywhere, for this to even have a chance of ever existing, they must get their cut, or they wouldn't let their middle managers in governments pass it. Just the reality.

I was just suggesting a potential offering to the rule makers to make it achievable. They have no kindness or mercy to appeal to, only money.