this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2024
174 points (99.4% liked)

196

16744 readers
1812 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago (7 children)

Disagree. Progress is good. It's grinding when it becomes too much. A little salt on my chips is good, too much is inedible.

[–] labsin 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (5 children)

Doesn't experience points based progress imply grinding?

There are more ways to have progression and I agree that exp points is a lazy (or pay2win) solution.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It implies a reward for work, which is a basic model all games use for basically everything you do.

How is it pay 2 win if you're not paying anything?

[edit] Okay, you said "or" xD Yeah, I'm sure Call of Duty would sell it to you.

[–] labsin 2 points 9 months ago

If you cannot complete a task cause you aren't strong enough, you have to either grind for exp or get better gear by collecting pointless objects and doing the list based crafting.

These things have nothing to do with any story progression and just suck up time and that's the point of the meme. You can perfectly design a game that uses less lazy ways of giving players a rewarding feeling that don't hold off the story line or take loads of time.

There is nothing wrong with gamers that want to have this, it's that every game that goes this route is not for a lot of casual games so it's not nice that almost every rpg goes this route.

Why I'm dragging pay to win into this, I don't know. Frustration with current generation games probably 😆 Also that they want you to spend lots of time in the game so you would spend more money in it, while I want to just play 1-2 hours and have a nice experience and story.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)