this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2024
126 points (97.7% liked)

World News

32263 readers
737 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArbitraryValue 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Except that lower-income people have more children, both globally and within South Korea.

[–] otp 3 points 7 months ago

Often because kids are either free labour (e.g. on the farm, working jobs to help the family, etc) or are "insurance"/"an investment" (hoping they'll make a kid who can support them with a good job in the future).

Where you don't need help tending a farm or something, child labour is illegal, and one's educated enough to know that their poor kids are more likely to grow up to be just as poor and thus not a "smart"/"safe" investment, it means that people will generally be less likely to have kids.

Most people live in cities in South Korea, where it'd usually be economically unfeasible to have kids.

I believe that education, particularly for women, tends to reduce the desire to have kids. Women without education may be less likely to envision alternative futures for themselves aside from being a wife and a mother. In South Korea in particular, it can be hard to be both a mother and a worker, particularly on the economics side of things.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

This may be true, but it doesn't change the fact that birthrate is declining due to unaffordability.