It's nice that you made this, but the formatting leaves a lot to desire. This chart wont break down specific codenames and IGP info, but it's far easier to read quickly.
AMD
For all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC, rumors, reviews, news and more.
Very clear and good summary on your part.
But we can all agree that this is one of the dumbest naming schemes in a while, at least since the GTX 16-series, right?
Laptop SKUs in general are stupid as hell, not helped by shit like NVIDIA deciding to do away with Max-Q/Max-P and thus make one have to do even more research about the capabilities of a laptop GPU that might not even be the same as its desktop counterpart ie the "laptop 4090 GPU"
Very clear and good summary on your part.
But we can all agree that this is one of the dumbest naming schemes in a while, at least since the GTX 16-series, right?
It's nice that you made this, but the formatting leaves a lot to desire. This chart wont break down specific codenames and IGP info, but it's far easier to read quickly.
Thanks for the effort. I'd rewrite the list like this:
Mobile SKU 7TFA#:
FA (family):
- FA=20: Mendocino (Zen2, RDNA2)
- FA=30: Barcelo-R (Zen3, Vega)
- FA=35: Rembrandt-R (Zen3, RDNA2)
- FA=40: Phoenix (and 7545U) (Zen4, RDNA3)
- FA=45: Dragon Range (except 7545U) (Zen4, RDNA2)
T (tier):
- T=3: Ryzen 3 (4 core)
- T=4: Ryzen 3 (4 core Phoenix)
- T=5: Ryzen 5 (4 core Mendocino, 6 cores otherwise)
- T=6: Ryzen 5 (6 core Phoenix or Dragon Range)
- T=7: Ryzen 7 (8 core)
- T=8: Ryzen 7 (8 core Phoenix, 12 core Dragon Range)
- T=9: Ryzen 9 (8 core Phoenix, 16 core Dragon Range)