Formula 1

9048 readers

65 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ Lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series

Rules

Be respectful to everyone; drivers, lemmings, redditors etc
No gambling, crypto or NFTs
Spoilers are allowed
Non English articles should include a translation in the comments by deepl.com or similar
Paywalled articles should include at least a brief summary in the comments, the wording of the article should not be altered
Social media posts should be posted as screenshots with a link for those who want to view it
Memes are allowed on Monday only as we all do like a laugh or 2, but don’t want to become formuladank.

Up next

F1 Calendar

2024 Calendar

Location	Date
🇺🇸 United States	21-23 Nov
🇶🇦 Qatar	29 Nov-01 Dec
🇦🇪 Abu Dhabi	06-08 Dec

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Ferrari's application to have the replacement PU, ES and CE for Sainz not counted against their allocation denied (lemmy.world)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

12 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 56 points 11 months ago

Okay, I'm not up on all the details of F1, but that sounds fucking stupid!

The track was literally faulty, the driver/car/team didn't do anything wrong, they shouldn't be punished.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It’s the US. Sue the City for compensatory damages.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

What a corporate distopian hell hole.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago

Of all the teams. This happens to Ferrari. Without bad luck, they have no luck at all.

[+] [email protected] -12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

[deleted]

[–] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It's not bad luck. It is incompetence by FOM resulting in massive damage to a team. People hosting the race(FOM in this case) should be aware of these things and ensure than drain cover failures like these don't happen

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

But..... money.

[+] [email protected] -17 points 11 months ago (3 children)

It wasn't a drain cover though. If you put a shelf up onto a wall, and then when you load up the shelf the wall falls over. That's not on you.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

https://www.npr.org/2020/01/07/794281632/ikea-reaches-46-million-settlement-over-death-of-toddler-killed-by-dresser-tip-o

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

It wasn't a drain cover though

Well the formula 1 article refers to it as a drain cover. It did look more like a cap but since I don't know the technical term, I went with what the official article referred to it as.

If you put a shelf up onto a wall, and then when you load up the shelf the wall falls over. That's not on you.

It is on you if you are the one who designed the shelf and decided to fix it at point of the wall without measuring if the wall could handle the load. It is different matter if you had a carpenter to build and install the shelf. In that it is his/her responsibility to ensure that the wall can handle a loaded shelf. In this case, since FOM are hosting the race, it is completely their responsibility that shit like this does not happen.

[–] profoundninja 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If you ask a a shelf building company to build you a shelf. You tell them the expected weight of items stored will be pretty extreme. Then the shelf fails from extreme weight.

surprised Pikachu face

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

expected

And there's the issue a lot of you are willingly ignoring. That seal could have been rated for 1000 whatever units, but put in under 1001 units with cars scraping over the top. Of course it'll fail.