this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
159 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

59669 readers
2997 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I'll bet if you actually use it 24/7 they will throttle/disconnect you. "Oh I'm sorry you used up your 1TB limit. No one needs more than that per month! Are you doing something illegal???"

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I was running 900 Mbps constant download for over 2 weeks on Zipply and never once got a notice. So they might honestly let people use the full data allowance.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

130TB huh? That’s a lot of Linux ISOs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You better download 2 cuz I’m not sharing.

[–] lustrum 7 points 1 year ago

Not that it's feasible, but they themselves won't have the bandwidth for a few 50gbps users 24/7.

My 1gbps service is a 2.5gbps GPON split between 32 other users, i've always seen 1gbps. But theoretically it would only take 3 of us to max the connection out

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I did something similar on Comcrap, but over the course of a month or 2 (Yes, I pay for their stupid little modem so I can get their stupid little addon for unlimited) and speeds varied between 600ish-850ish

I thought for SURE I was going to get something, at the very least a "Hey your usage patterns have massively changed, check your network for intruders" email.

I didn't get squat, so if Comcrap of all companies can do it I don't see why any other would have a problem with it lmao

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At the quoted speed, I think they should be legally obligated to provide 15,821 TB of data transfer per month, at a bare minimum.

@yote_zip
@whfsdude

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh, its actually "up to" 50gb/s, you may get a lower speed like 3.3mb/s.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

We're hiring!

The job pays between $1 and $1,000,000/yr

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I rarely get the top speed that I pay for. At least I'm not paying $900/month for the same speed.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Earlier this year fiber became available to my house, switched providers in a heartbeat to ditch cable. Saved more than half my monthly bill and I get a consistent 945 every time I test it. Rubbing my nipples while telling Cox to go Cox themselves was a high I lived off of for a couple months.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've had Ziply Fiber before (but not 50 Gbps) and would max their upload for months and they didn't even bat an eye. It's the only ISP that I would ever recommend.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We have Ziply Fiber at my house (used to have Comcast) and I am kind of blown away by the service. I've had problems with outages twice and each time they notified us via text or email. It's pretty awesome and we torrent all the time.

On Comcast even with the pro blast super plan we were constantly hitting the cap and getting throttled. I don't even know what the cap is on our plan now. Never seen any evidence of throttling.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

When you need that blu ray rip right now

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is kind of cool, but at the same time, there's gotta be a catch. Beside that, I can't imagine a situation where a residential location might want that. Even if I had a self-hosted data center for my entire family, their friends, and friends of their friends, I still couldn't saturate that bandwidth

[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Isn't the catch that it's 900 dollars a month?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

About 10 years ago, the muni fiber outfit in the town next door lit up 10Gbit fiber for their entire footprint. The price? $900/mo. It's currently $300/mo, and they just turned on 25Gbit across their entire footprint ($1500/mo).

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's probably still a bandwidth cap and it's probably still the same shitty 1tb everyone else gets with overage charges per gigabyte or some shit.

"It costs four hundred thousand dollars to ~~fire this weapon~~ download a file for 12 seconds"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

They are pretty transparent on their terms on their website. No caps on any of their other plans.

You are using shared bandwidth like all other residential plans, meaning that if there is no available bandwidth on the network you get what you get. That's the catch.

Turns out when you install bundles of 80Tb/s fiber long haul interconnects. Upselling to enthusiasts can be profitable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hotels might be interested

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hotels are commercial property

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Orphanages then. Or student dorms

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (5 children)

why? does anyone need this?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

This is a publicity stunt and an ad, no, residential users don't need it. No one is gonna sign up, but it's viral marketing targeted to land in exactly places like this and we eat it up

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If I had this I'd probably just become the neighborhood ISP, sell 1 gig symmetrical to 49 houses for $100/mo and you're no longer paying for that connection after 9 customers

Permits, a mini JCB, buried fiber runs and stuff would be expensive though... as well as routers for each customer... ah maybe I'd pass on that business opportunity actually 😅

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

You could probably also run a pretty mean Wi-Fi connection. Like neighborhood mesh Network, $50 a month per person.

[–] lustrum 2 points 1 year ago

You could probably sell a 1gig service to 200 users on a 50gbps line. That's how GPON works and mostly people don't have issues.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

to download GTA V in 2 seconds

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Why do we need anything more than a 56k modem? It's already way faster than my 9600 baud setup.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

I haven’t looked into point to point wireless in a few years. Seems like this could be a use. One person pays and then blasts that connection to the whole neighborhood.

Otherwise there is zero residential need for these speeds.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You could download your entire backlog in minutes!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I hope the three customers they ever get will be enough. That's $10,800 which is more than many even make.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This is awesome!!

We're moving to a town that has Ziply.