this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2023
21 points (92.0% liked)

Academia

818 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This is horrifying. No wonder no one listens to ecologists... in my opinion if their data is this widely open to interpretation, the experimental design is deeply flawed

[โ€“] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

To me, the dataset and topic look so open-ended, and the dataset looks designed for people to mix random effects in many different ways.

All this study does is highlight the lack of hypothetico deductive reasoning in so much research these days.

It's also gross that nature is writing articles on pre prints, IMHO