this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
337 points (94.2% liked)

Technology

59735 readers
2693 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

But what if you do? Will you get caught?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 126 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If it's publicly accessible it's scrape-able. He already tried to make tweets not publicly accessible and look how long that lasted.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s not even clear that it’s illegal to scrape publicly available data, so I don’t know what the TOS would be enforcing.

[–] coffee_poops 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It didn't have to be illegal for them to sue you for violating its policies. It would be a civil suit for damages.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lol, then they would have to demonstrate that there were damages. The worst a TOS violation will get you is a ban.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's still a billionaire suing you for those peanuts.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Suing for 50 dollar or so? Fine.

[–] coffee_poops 3 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, they have more money to blow on legal fees. The threat of a suit is enough to keep most perks from fucking around and finding out.

[–] Salix 2 points 1 year ago

Would it be violating policy if the scrapper only took the public data and never actually signed the ToS since they didn't make an account?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's not publicly available anymore. If you're not logged in you don't see anything anymore except tweets you have a direct link to. Even then you don't see any replies and the amount of tweets per day you can see is limited.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yep, would never remember on the odd occasions I would look at Twitter, then just leave the site after being prompted to login

[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Lol this has the same energy as those NFT idiots crying about people taking screenshots of their stupid monkeys.

Noooo, stop scraping my dataaaa!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never waste an opportunity to use "muh" in place of "my"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

And the next generation of AI probably only needs a fraction of the data it needs now so the need to scrape the data is gone.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I hope someone makes some manic bot that scrapes every last tweet and posts it on a duplicate site call Y

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Might as well go whole hog and do the entire alphabet. Then do one for every iteration of every letter combination.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 year ago

He's still mad at those researchers for scraping the data that shows that ever since he took over, the antisemitism, racism and general bigotry has gone up on the platform.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Let the Supreme Court enforce it ;)

[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 year ago

It should, but it won't.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m pretty sure both parties must agree to the terms before they legally bind anyone so wouldn’t this just apply to logged in users?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Accessing the website is often viewed as accepting the terms, so that wouldn't hold up. Not that they'd have a legal standpoint on the issue.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Accessing the website is often viewed as accepting the terms

The scraping bot can't read the terms

But even if it could, it wouldn't give a damn :-)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

By reading this message you agree to my terms that I'm really cool

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Lol and you username

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

How do you read the terms without accessing their website?

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How on earth will do they plan on enforcing that? xD

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They don't have to enforce it. If someone says bad things about Twitter by analysing their content, Twitter can sue them scraping.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

“Our interns spent 500 hours collecting the raw data”.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

deleted by creator

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago

This is hilariously unenforceable as long as Twitter is on the public internet.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I thought this was an article about the X Windows system based on the preview for the article. Boy are those two similar-looking.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You could always join wayland.social

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Realistically, very little people know about x windows system even less care about it.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Or just stop using X all together.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Crawling for me, not thee!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just update robot.txt coward!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Took a look at their robots.txt, it appears to block all bots except Google.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

don't!

You heard him, scrape more.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

So he’s going to sue google then?