this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2023
5 points (77.8% liked)

News

327 readers
1 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
 

A small proportion of people in the US are responsible for eating 50 per cent of the beef consumed in the country, which is a major contributor to greenhouse gas emissions

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

asks participants to recall what they ate in the past 24 hours. Rose and his team used this information to calculate how much beef people ate on a given day. They found that 45 per cent of participants ate none, whereas about 12 per cent ate more than four ounces per 2200 calories a day. These heavy beef eaters accounted for about half of the country’s beef consumption on a given day.

Ummm isn't this incredibly bad logic?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Very - Report the post as it's misleading.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That journal reference sends me to a site where it can't be found to.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What a weird study. They only asked participants what they ate in the past 24 hours.

So that means a small proportion of people eat half the beef consumed on a given day. For that matter, a small proportion of people probably eat most of the strawberries consumed on a given day.

The title implies that there is a small group of people eating most of the beef produced in the US. But people don't usually eat the same thing every day. So the study only shows that most Americans are unlikely to eat beef today.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seems likely to me that they asked that because they felt respondents would be most likely to recall what they'd eaten most recently, and less likely to be able to do so outside of that window.

Not sure what the real problems are extrapolating that that one day is a typical day given that routinely you extrapolate from a small sample, if that sample is representative, to much larger populations with pretty acceptable margins for error.

I guess the question is, was this question asked at a time or in a manner that would lead us to know that the period being asked about was in some way atypical for the population being asked.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The study design was reasonable. The unreasonable part is implying that what the respondents did that day is what they do every other day. Because what respondents do on that day does not necessarily predict what they do on other days.

In other words, it is reasonable to assert "On a given day, 12% of the population consumes half of the beef produced that day". It is not reasonable to imply "12% of the population consumes half of the beef produced in any given time period".

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Cows Georg is an outlier and should not have been counted

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Pretty sure most of that is just the Guga Foods guy by himself.