this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
314 points (99.4% liked)

Canada

8639 readers
1779 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Looks like Canada is going to have a future after all!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 17 hours ago

I missed the sub name and was momentarily hopeful the left in the US was going to get some kind of meaningful leadership.

How silly of me.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Reminder of the Liberal's record on proportional representation: "Liberals never wanted to β€œmake every vote count.”… Electoral reform has become a bonbon offered at election. As far back as 1919, Liberals have campaigned on the promise of proportional representation"

Mark Carney's position on electoral reform: "open". However...

  1. He’s an economist, and the mathematics pairs quiet nicely with the mathematics of electoral systems.
  2. His public persona is that he is intelligent. But when asked specifically about electoral reform and proportional representation, he says he’s uncertain and open to exploring options? Why would someone as smart as him be uncertain about ensuring every vote counts?

Only the Greens/NDP consistently support proportional representation.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Why would someone as smart as him be uncertain about ensuring every vote counts?

Because it's an absolute waste of political capital to make happen if there isn't a strong movement fighting for it.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Even if there is no intention to improve our democracy, it's a really low bar to just agree that every vote should count...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I agree, but I'm not the one you need to convince, it's Terry on Facebook who spends 2 hours a day complaining about bike lanes and vegans.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

It's okay, we're just having a conversation. Stakes aren't high.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kecessa 2 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

You've posted that same comment 5 times in the past few hours, that's not how you convince people.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I suppose, but it certainly draws attention to the movement. And on occasion discussion does come about, in which case that is the opportunity to convince people.

And in the past 2 weeks the [email protected] has grown by 60%, so clearly something I'm doing is working.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί