this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
342 points (94.3% liked)

Open Source

32368 readers
1357 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Article: https://proton.me/blog/deepseek

Calls it "Deepsneak", failing to make it clear that the reason people love Deepseek is that you can download and it run it securely on any of your own private devices or servers - unlike most of the competing SOTA AIs.

I can't speak for Proton, but the last couple weeks are showing some very clear biases coming out.

(page 3) 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (6 children)

It might be that they're equating the name with the app and company, not the open source model, based on one of the first lines:

AI chat apps like ChatGPT collect user data, filter responses, and make content moderation decisions that are not always transparent.

Emphasis mine. The rest of the article reads the same way.

Most people aren't privacy-conscious enough to care who gets what data and who's building the binaries and web apps, so sounding the alarm is appropriate for people who barely know the difference between AI and AGI.

I get that people are mad at Proton right now (anyone have a link? I'm behind on the recent stuff), but we should ensure we get mad at things that are real, not invent imaginary ones based on contrived contexts.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most people aren't privacy-conscious enough to care who gets what data

I assume most people who pay for proton don’t fall into this category

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Perhaps, and if they do indeed care and read that blog, maybe they'll share it with friends who don't have a clue.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›