this post was submitted on 22 Jan 2025
1586 points (98.6% liked)

pics

19993 readers
2251 users here now

Rules:

1.. Please mark original photos with [OC] in the title if you're the photographer

2..Pictures containing a politician from any country or planet are prohibited, this is a community voted on rule.

3.. Image must be a photograph, no AI or digital art.

4.. No NSFW/Cosplay/Spam/Trolling images.

5.. Be civil. No racism or bigotry.

Photo of the Week Rule(s):

1.. On Fridays, the most upvoted original, marked [OC], photo posted between Friday and Thursday will be the next week's banner and featured photo.

2.. The weekly photos will be saved for an end of the year run off.

Weeks 2023

Instance-wide rules always apply. https://mastodon.world/about

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 163 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Introducing the new Model SS.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 23 hours ago

You can get a box trailer upgrade for the model X that can transport 'livestock' on the cheap, called the model X-terminate

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 210 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The Swasticar Wankpanzer is 100% something he would call the truck if his sycophant followers jokingly suggested it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 155 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Brave protest. Pretty sure Nazi imagery is illegal in Germany. Somebody correct me if I’m wrong

[–] [email protected] 440 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Making the German state officially state that this is Nazi imagery would be a worthwhile win lol.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure they have explicitly come out and said that the gesture was what we all know it to be. I'm sure the Internet can verify it for you though

[–] [email protected] 4 points 14 hours ago

Not sure about anyone from the government much less in an official function but e.g. the Zeit used the title "A Hitler salute is a Hitler salute is a Hitler salute", and the rest of the press isn't any more ambiguous, either.

[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 day ago

lol didn’t even think of that

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 day ago

Holy shit nice

[–] [email protected] 21 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Freedom of art in that regard. The only illegal thing might be to project something to the factory

[–] [email protected] 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Nope it's legal. §303 StGB:

Whoever, without being authorised to do so, substantially and permanently alters the appearance of an object belonging to another [...]

Projections are far from permanent. What I'm blanking on right now is whether cleaning something is captured under that wording, I vaguely remember them discussing changing it, dunno if they have. If a wall is dirty enough you can make a great graffito with nothing but a pressure washer.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago (3 children)

A projection is not permanent mate.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 hours ago

That is what he said yes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Is that a thing in Germany? Genuinely asking

[–] [email protected] 6 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes. You can even use a swastika if the intend is clear. For example a figure throwing it into a trashcan.

I'm not a lawyer, but the word "Heil" ist not forbidden and Also its a picture of something relevant that happened. So in my opinion the Art itself is not illegal. Only the projection onto the building.

Someone correct me if I'm wrong.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago

You're welcome :)

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 day ago (15 children)

There's plenty of "fair use" cases which would allow it.

§86a STGB allows for the use of "symbols of anti-constitutional organizations" in cases of:

  • art (e.g. the movie "Downfall")
  • scientific research
  • education
  • news or other broadcast (covering Nazi Protests in the US for example, German news station don't have to censor the Swastika flags or the like)

And probably applying in this case - in protesting said anti-constitutional organizations, for example a crossed out Swastika as a form of protest against Nazis is still very much legal.

Most important is the intent. If you plan to use those symbols with the intent of furthering the ideology of anti-constitutional organizations, it is probably forbidden. The intention has to be clearly against those organizations, otherwise it might be actionable.

Btw the communist party of Germany, the KPD is also considered an anti-constitutional organization and therefore it's symbols are forbidden in the same way.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago (4 children)

It is with few exceptions. Given that it looks like the purpose is to call out a Nazi supporter I think they wouldn't get in trouble for that though.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 184 points 1 day ago (6 children)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 day ago

Man baby needs to be held accountable for his actions.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›