this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2025
310 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

60610 readers
3263 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Naz 3 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Anyone know the cost per kilogram?

Edit: Apparently $20,000/kg

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Why don't they just use diamond, the hardest metal?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 hour ago

Hardness isn't the best thing to have in armor. In fact, extreme hardness means extreme brittleness.

Tensile strength is more desirable in armor. That's the sort of strength that a string or rope, or Kevlar will have.

Those can stretch a bit before breaking.

Kevlar will stretch a bit when catching a bullet, this does a few things, but importantly it slows the bullet before stopping it.

So this new material will likely show extreme tensile strength rather than hardness.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 40 minutes ago

I thought Dragonforce was the hardest metal known to man?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago

I did your mom stronger

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

At least it’s not 100 trillion James Bonds.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 37 minutes ago

Not if Hank Scorpio has anything to say about it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I can't wait to find out how toxic this is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 hours ago

They will make it into a mandatory dress uniform for school children.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 hours ago

With these bonds so dense, I want to imagine that it would actually be quite non-toxic as these is little to react with.

Then again, I'm not a bio chemist

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Good news, it’s completely non toxic.

Bad news, it costs 2 million dollars per square foot.

The pentagon will now take your whole paycheck.

Thank you for your support, patriot.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Good news, it costs 2 million dollars per square foot, so they won't militarise the police further with it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 hours ago

Well not immediately… Years from now when the military develops something even better then this will all become surplus and sold off to SWAT teams etc. for next to nothing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 hours ago

The article says the process is scalable.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

....and uses it to oppress and/or disenfranchise poor people

[–] [email protected] 8 points 7 hours ago

You mispronounced promote American interests.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 hours ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

This is still basic research, it's not close to commercialization.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

I don't know if this will actually pan out the way that they imply in the title; armor needs to have a lot of different characteristics in order to be practical. As in, resistance to heat and cold, resistance to acids, alkalines, petroleum distillates, salts, UV, and oxygen, and also resist deformation. Multiple materials have displays significant promise for armor, but had a very short lifespan in real-word conditions. For instance, there was a material trademarked as Zylon that was supposed to be better than Kevlar, and it was used extensively by Second Chance (a body armor company); several cops were killed when their armor failed, and the armor failed because of exposure to sweat and ambient heat.

Yeah, this is a super cool development, but remember that everything that comes out at this stage is hype.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

The armor works perfectly fine as long as it's not exposed to oxygen. But when's that ever going to happen?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 hours ago

That by itself isn't terrible, that could still be used if it is sealed in something like an era brick if it's good enough.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Yes... that's why they use the word "could". This is how research works and what reasonable science reporting looks like. There were no promises or wild claims made in the article.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Layer it with Kevlar and good?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 hours ago

It really depends on whether it can be made to meet all the other criteria required for armor. I think that it's too early to make any good predictions.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

So this is what John Wick had in his suit

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

I loved those movies but they went way to hard into that suit in the later movies. I got ridiculous lol.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 hours ago

My favorite part was when he held the jacket up like a curtain. The material may be bullet proof, but the bullet will still push it out of the way like that lol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 hours ago

They did Rambo the franchise a bit.

[–] Grandwolf319 120 points 22 hours ago (9 children)

Now this is a technology post!

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›