this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2024
698 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

59958 readers
3304 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

I guess this device needed to connect to some remotely hosted server that enabled its functionality. And the company was losing money and hoping that sales would eventually pick up enough to make them profitable. But their latest investor decided not to put any more money in, and the company ran out of cash and can't pay its bills anymore.

The entrepreneur thought he could get more investor cash and ran the business in such a way that it would fall off a cliff if he didn't. And... He failed to secure more financing.

I have mixed feelings about products like this... If the device somehow needed to host an entire internet's worth of data to function, it certainly wouldn't have cost only $800. But when you buy a product that depends on the ongoing viability of the seller, you're in a position of caveat emptor - You better vet them out yourself, especially if they're new.

Hopefully the founders feel some emotional attachment to their product and the trust bestowed upon them by their unknowing customers, and release whatever on the back end makes the thing work so that motivated customers could reactivate their devices somehow.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What are the genuine use cases for such a robot? For when the kid has issues communicating with other people?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

A robot has infinite patience and will never get mad or bully a child for fun. Ideally, this should also be true of a parent, but it's not. From a less grim angle, a robot doesn't have other responsibilities like work.

For a kid who feels too shy to talk to people, a robot can be good for practice. But it requires a lot of attentiveness from parents to make sure the child doesn't become dependent and moves on to taking to people once they get their confidence.

Back when drag was a kid, we used imaginary friends instead of robots. But a lot of parents and children don't believe in imaginary friends, which is a shame, because robots are a lot more expensive.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's also probably a developmental aid also. As someone with a child, you'd be surprised at how laser-focused parents can be with regards to developmental delays or issues and ensuring that their kids have every opportunity to meet specific milestones.

IMO while it's absolutely not a replacement for human interaction, something like this with the right backing could be very useful to a lot of kids that need additional help.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Nothing like this should ever rely on an external server.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

Emotional support brick their CEO's face

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

you come across headlines nowadays and have no clue this was even a thing people were grifting children about, man..

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Sorry Sally, Geoffrey has to die because a company wanted to make their products utterly dependent on their servers. We'll bury him in the yard next to Gertrude.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›