this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024
71 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1430 readers
106 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Jacob Silverman:

It's March 2025. Everyone has resigned from OpenAI except Altman, a single H1B programmer, 50 lawyers, and the guy who refills the keurig. The company is worth $4 trillion.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

I guess in this scenario, Balaji's fetishized hyperinflation finally happens sometime in the next 6 months.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 months ago (2 children)

They’re gonna start announcing real concrete nefarious-ass use cases real soon

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

World's least efficient baby mulcher

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

A Bill Hicks routine manifest:

"What did ya do with your AI today, Sam?"

"Oh, we made ah, we made ah, arsenic ah, childhood food now, goodnight."

[lays down and snores]

"Yeah, we just said you know is your baby really too loud? You know?"

[snores]

"Yeah, it'll... you know the mums will love it."

[snores]

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

I wouldn't be shocked at a working agreement with Palmer Luckey's Anduril to offer AI-assisted god-knows-what to Anduril's military/surveillance hardware.

EDIT: my brain took a dookie and I mixed up Luckey's first and last names.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

To be fair, Luckey Palmer is an objectively funnier name.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

Oh no! But what happened to We’re not doing it for the money but the good of humanity, and If anybody approaches AGI before us we will shut down and use all our resources to help them instead?

It’s almost as if all of that has been nothing but a load of bullshit from the beginning.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 months ago

He'll be out of there with the bag in less than a year.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

Should rename themselves ClosedAI

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

@dgerard So um now we can get on into the sunk cost fallacy phase of "AI"-pre-winter? I mean how much how much VC money have they already burnt to heat up sand at data centers? Does MICROS~1 granting them Azure use count?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Apparently MS gives OpenAI Azure credits, but those are near cost price - so if OpenAI uses them, MS has to spend real money on GPUs and electricity.

MS also has rights to OpenAI's software. So OpenAI is functionally a Microsoft subsidiary that pretends to be a separate company to insulate MS from blame for the shit OpenAI pulls.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

@dgerard Right, that actually is investor money being set on fire to activate sand; and I guess MS own half of the previously existing for-profit OpenAI; mostly this makes me wonder how much more money they can set fire to and how fast

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I'm actually shocked at how desperate capitalists are to finding their next hype bubble. Like the fact it is good for statistics is the only whiff of something real they needed to go all in.

Can no one afford steady incremental returns anymore?

EDIT word

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago

@grrgyle @techtakes I suspect steady/incremental returns mean dwindling asset value in the current business environment, typified by rapid churn and major tech transitions every decade (to say nothing of climate change and an unstable global political situation). If 10% of your investment portfolio becomes non-viable every decade (eg. no good owning coal fields any more) you have to grow fast or die. At least, that's how the investment funds see it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

When the music stops can't MS just let OpenAI go bankrupt and keep the tech?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Food $200
Data $150
Rent $800
Glorified markov chains $5000000000
Utility $150
someone who is good at the economy please help me budget this. my investors are dying

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

RIP rationalist moonshot. Takes a special kind of SV-libertarian brainrot to think the world will be saved by a company. Do we have EY's reaction yet?