this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2023
1043 points (93.8% liked)

Memes

44907 readers
2841 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 254 points 1 year ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 year ago (14 children)

This.

I can handle DDMMYY[YY] it reads correctly. But YYYYMMDD is numerically correct, most signifcant to least significant digitwise.

That thing only American's do, is completely non-sensical.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For sorting or filing, I agree. I think in day to day life, though, Day and month are way more significant. So I actually prefer DDMMYYYY for that.

[–] tillary 22 points 1 year ago (6 children)

DDMMYYYY would be great, if it weren't for 95% of Americans that use MMDDYYYY. Is 07/02/2000 July 2nd or Feb 7th?

Thus the only solution is to write out the month or start with the year, because no logical group of people currently use YYYYDDMM. Plus by using YYYYMMDD you get the added benefit of the dates all being sortable using dumber applications.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

I absolutely loath the American favorite: 8/9. Like fuck, is that August 9th, September 8th, or just a fraction??

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

8601 for life

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I expected to see this when I looked at the comments, and you didn't disappoint me!

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 152 points 1 year ago (5 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

/c/iso8601 assemble !

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

It's the only one that makes any logical sense!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Absolutely! Everything else needs special algos for organization to put it in the proper order. This format just works numerically out of the box.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ISO-8601. God's own date-time format

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The overlap of iso-8601 and rfc-3339 is God's own, the regions outside are lower.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This person sorts

[–] newIdentity 142 points 1 year ago (16 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Thaaaank you

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hungarians feeling superior with their YYYY.MM.DD fornat.

Although that's not ideal for URLs

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 year ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago

Use hyphens instead of slashes and we're on the same page.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Even better, easier sorting.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] gusVLZ 51 points 1 year ago

yyyyMMddTHH:mm:ss.sss+Z for the win

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

I like DDMMYY but for some reason when I include the time as ss:mm:hh nobody shows up to the event on time.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Tired: ISO date format

Wired: milliseconds since the Unix Epoch

Galactic brain: Planck time units since the Big Bang

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I always wonder why old memes are losing pixels and quality. Like an old paper shared over the years.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's because people keep taking screenshots of the image and sharing the screenshot instead of the original image file. It's like making a copy of a copy of a copy until it looks like garbage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

because they get downloaded from say reddit and then reuploaded again a year later or so which since most sites/services compress files uploaded they get worse and worse quality

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

As usual, there's an xkcd for that. Along with a more detailed explanation.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I'd have to say April 25th because it's not too hot, not too cold. All you need is a light jacket.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

to make things as not confusing as possible, my rule of thumb is:

  • yyyy-mm-dd (yyyy instead of yy ensures that it's not mistaken for dd-mm-yy) (hyphens can be replaced with underscores)
  • dd.mm.yyyy (yyyy same as above) (really dislike using for filenames, sorting doesn't work)
  • mm/dd/yyyy (only if there is no other choice) edit: mm/dd/yyyy vs mm/dd/yy doesn't matter because both make 0 sense already edit2: i forgor to say that yyyy also avoids y2.1k and subsequent issues
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The first one you listed is an ISO standard date format, and is the only way to go :)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

To eliminate this confusion I propose the days of the month should start from 13.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

yall trippin, it should be MMYYDD

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Look at this moron. DY-MY-DM is the only logical date format.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Unix timestamp for me thanks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Date aside, what's going on with that " blank character " bullshit in the " question " ?

load more comments
view more: next ›