Open Source

31088 readers

1126 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Review: Turris Omnia, a FOSS wifi router, NAS and Server, based on a highly improved OpenWRT, with BTRFS! (slrpnk.net)

submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

11 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 11 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Edit to add: It appears that the “mt76” Wi-Fi 6 driver is open source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_open-source_wireless_drivers#Status

Pardon my ignorance, but what Linux device driver(s) does one use for the Wi-Fi 6 11ax 4T4R Mini PCIe Module (AW7915-NP1)? I’ve been under the (hopefully false) impression that open source drivers don’t exist for Wi-Fi modules beyond the 802.11n (A.K.A. Wi-Fi 4) standard.

Edit to add:
Maybe the driver really is open source? I’m not familiar with Linux kernel/driver foo, so I’m not really sure, but this doesn’t look like a binary blob to me: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/tree/drivers/net/wireless/mediatek/mt76/mt7915
The code seems to be under the ISC license, which I’ve never encountered before, but it seems to me an open source license.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Interesting find! Cant help you thougj

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That seems a bit rough combining all those into one, can't upgrade anything separately.

I'm not sure on the security/safety of combining your gateway and NAS either.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago

Having a router as a NAS is pretty standard.

But you are right, it may be less secure.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago

They look very cool but IMO a bit overpriced for the proposed hardware spec?

For the same price range you can get a full n100 16GB dual ethernet 2.5gbit with a 5x2.5gbit ethernet switch and wifi extender.

But yeah those aren't FOSS, so maybe that's their selling point?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I haven't found (while cross reading ) details about why the "highly improved" didn't make it to upstream openwrt?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They contribute upstream, another user here is running upstream OpenWRT.

I assume they just have a heavier WebUI and a more "bloated" configuration, which wouldnt suit OpenWRT

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

Ah that would make sense, thanks!

[–] pastermil 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I don't know... At this point might as well use something not designed for embedded. Debian comes to mind. Or Alpine if you want something more minimalist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

If you want to configure all that XD I dont want to.

You say OpenWRT is not designed for embedded computers? I cant imagine why not.

[–] pastermil 1 points 2 months ago

No, I said OpenWRT is designed exactly for embedded, and the use case calls for anything but.