this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
967 points (95.7% liked)

Just Post

555 readers
8 users here now

Just post something 💛

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Remember an op-ed is a blood pact. Everything the NYT puts out again should be viewed through this lens. They endorsed not voting, and nothing will ever make that not true..

Edit: oh look it was trivial to find a form on their website to let them know what I think.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

I didn't get the news that Musk had bought the NYT.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Looking forward to this one guy being held up as representative of the entire 1/3 of Americans who don't vote, as well as third party voters of all stripes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] -1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

less other people vote, more worth your vote will have if you vote something others weren't going to vote

[–] [email protected] -3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wasn't going to vote but you convinced me that there is an agenda to get me to not vote so now I'm going to vote for trump.

spoilerNot really, but still, why is the assumption that not voting means a vote is lost for democrats?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Mostly because the people that don’t feel represented are overwhelmingly on the left.

You won’t find many right-wing people dissatisfied with the current choices, if they’re extremists they’d vote Trump and if they aren’t they’re probably fine with Biden. The only reason I can think of for a potential Republican voter not going is that they think Trump will win anyway and they don’t need their vote.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 months ago (1 children)

So if democrats need those votes from the left, why don't they try appealing to those voters?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›