this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2023
87 points (89.9% liked)

Linux

46775 readers
2113 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Appimages, snaps and flatpaks, which one do you prefer and why?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

i use arch just so i don't have to use any of these

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Pacman > Flatpak > won't use it

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm still trying them out, but if they work as advertised, then AppImages. That's mostly because I use my desktop and laptop pretty much equally, so being able to copy and AppImage from one to the other and keep going would be really handy.

On a similar note, if a computer dies, being able to just copy and paste them to a new computer, or run them from a portable drive would be great.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

yes appimages are good but my problem with them is that when there is a new version i should download them again and again....

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Have you met appimageupdater?

[–] Drito 3 points 1 year ago

The arch repos are enough for me except two softwares so I downloaded them as appimages. Appimages are enough for my small needs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Snaps, hell no. I wouldn't touch anything Canonical TBH.

Appimages are very chaotic.

Fkatpaks leave a bunch of trash after uninstalling.

I use Flatpaks, while they are not perfect, they are improving.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Fkatpaks leave a bunch of trash after uninstalling.

From my experience, most of the things I'd like to delete after uninstalling are in ~/.var/app/(App ID)/.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

None of them

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think I've ever actually found a flatpack in the wild. Not a fan of snaps but have a few appimages that seen to work fine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I prefer all of them (including Snap) we should have a kid together and ask them their preference.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Flatpaks are insecure by design as they don't cryptographically verify their authenticity after download. Snaps too.

Install with a proper package manager that was designed doe security. Most OS package managers are designed with this.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I've only used flatpak and I honestly see no reason to try anything else. The only issue I've encountered is that Steam games launched by the Steam flatpak occasionally act strange (sometimes they can't locate graphics drivers or connect to online services).

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Snaps. Everyone seems to hate them for ideological reasons rather than practical reasons. But for me, they just work. And if Canonical gets out of line, there's already been proof of concepts of third-party snap repositories, so that's a moot point.

Flatpaks seem like a solution in search of a problem to me. Not everything is a gui app, so not sure why the devs aren't supporting cli apps well. But the biggest problem is that most software I use simply isn't available as flatpaks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

Cli apps not being available as flatpaks is a huge oversight. It makes using flatpaks as my main source of applications a non starter.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›