this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

Formula 1

5563 readers
1 users here now

c/formula1

Welcome to c/formula1.

Rules

Please keep discussions civil, respect other's opinions, and keep it friendly. Please read our rules before posting in our community.

Rules TLDR

Resources

These sites are a good place to start finding out about Formula 1, aside from right here of course!

Formula1.com - the official Formula 1 website.
Formula 1 Youtube - the official F1 youtube channel.
Liquipedia Overview - what's happening now and next in a nice dashboard.
F1Calendar.com - never miss a session again!
F1Countdown.com - for those of you who like countdowns!

Sister Communities

!Motorsports - for the love of racing outside of Formula 1.
[email protected] - because you love memes.
[email protected] - let's race!

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Good to see. The way drivers had to rejoin the track was really strange. Not to mention dangerous.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

The type of crash the barrier was extended to prevent is still possible, maybe they can build a safe rejoining lane by next year to get the best of both worlds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

This decision may have been premature in my opinion. It was a new change and the teams had to navigate it wet conditions on top of that, so I can understand the frustration. It may be back. Running this track in Assetto Corsa for over 220 laps, Turn 1 was always dangerous and needed to be fixed.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

with Lewis Hamilton apparently pointing out that he’d never seen a car have the type of accident that the barrier extension was designed to prevent.

Sure, it's not like there have been freak accidents in motorsport that killed people. If some day it does happen, everyone is blaming the FIA for not preventing it.

Concerns are fine and perhaps the wall is bad, but this comment is ridiculous.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree. Just because you have not seen it doesn't mean it can't (or won't) happen.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yep, there is no reason to wait for someone to die to make changes to a dangerous turn on a circuit. Being proactive is always a good thing, even if they don’t get it right on the first attempt.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

This really should have been sorted way before any cars hit the track on Friday. Seeing cars driving head on towards other cars and rejoining the track so slowly and at a 90° angle? Yeah that seems fine…

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thank goodness. I can see why they wanted the extension, but it wasn't the best execution, like taking one step forward and three steps back with cars rejoining the track against head-on traffic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

At least the drivers can stay off the grass now. IMO it was fine how it was before and has always just been a part of the circuit that if you go deep in T1 you cut to T2 exit 🤷