this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2024
376 points (87.9% liked)

Technology

59770 readers
3133 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Setting aside the usual arguments on the anti- and pro-AI art debate and the nature of creativity itself, perhaps the negative reaction that the Redditor encountered is part of a sea change in opinion among many people that think corporate AI platforms are exploitive and extractive in nature because their datasets rely on copyrighted material without the original artists' permission. And that's without getting into AI's negative drag on the environment.

(page 5) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] -2 points 8 months ago (10 children)

The anti AI movement is so interesting. Its what I imagine how people would have imagined other progress like the printing press

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago (7 children)

This needs to change : there is no AI art. Art is something humans do, and AI is something that does not exist.

There cannot be AI art.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] -3 points 8 months ago

Simply put, it requires an artistic sense to pick out the art from the junk that AI generates

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›