this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2024
70 points (98.6% liked)

Astronomy

3876 readers
439 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (2 children)

at one point we have to realize theres an infinite number of small rocks orbiting any given planet

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Why you gotta be so mean to my itty bitty moon brothers and sisters?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago

The itty bitty satellite committee

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Does Earth also have such small orbiting rocks that are a few kilometers wide?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

No, we only have one moon. I think the gravity of the moon is too large for other moons to be in a stable orbit around Earth.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (3 children)

They really need to change the name to Urectum to end the jokes about how to pronounce it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Tbh no other language but English has the same problem. In some languages it is simply 'Uran', and it does not mean anything but Uran.

[–] Lucidlethargy 2 points 6 months ago

Agreed, but knowing scientists that'll probably take at least 596 years to achieve.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

That's no moon that's a space station.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

i wonder if something that size would even have noticable gravity