Technology

62596 readers

2488 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

792

Why Everyone Should Still Use an RSS Reader in 2024 (lifehacker.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

207 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Whatever the linguistic details, one of the main roles of RSS is to supply directly to you a steady stream of updates from a website. Every new article published on that site is served up in a list that can be interpreted by an RSS reader.

Unfortunately, RSS is no longer how most of us consume "content." (Google famously killed its beloved Google Reader more than a decade ago.) It's now the norm to check social media or the front pages of many different sites to see what's new. But I think RSS still has a place in your life: Especially for those who don't want to miss anything or have algorithms choosing what they read, it remains one of the best ways to navigate the internet. Here's a primer on what RSS can (still!) do for you, and how to get started with it, even in this late era of online existence.

(page 3) 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I highly recommend NewsBlur if you don’t want to host your own.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Used Google Reader and now use Feedly. I go ahead and pay for Feedly since I like it enough to do so.

I can't imagine not using RSS to consume stuff. It just makes things so much easier.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Inoreader, FTW!

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

When Google’s shut down I switched to Feedly. They even imported my Google settings so there was no downtime. I’ve been paying for their Pro version ever since. It’s a really good app!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I switched from Reddit to Lemmy, I started using Feeder for news to fill that gap. I think my podcast app on Linux also uses RSS.

I also used Feeder with Nitter for a while to keep up with friends posting on Twitter (I never really got into Twitter myself). Though that stopped working at some point.

So yeah, RSS definitely still has uses today.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

If anyone is using an apple device, NetNewsWire is open source and is dead simple. No extra features, no premium tier, can sync with iCloud or self hosted servers, and the reader mode can be applied source-wide.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

On IOS try feeeed

https://apps.apple.com/de/app/feeeed-rss-reader-and-more/id1600187490

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does anybody have any recommendations for FOSS RSS readers with actual content surfacing features? So many RSS feeds are full of junk (this is particularly a problem with feeds with wildly disparate posting frequencies) and I've always felt they'd be a lot more useful if people were putting more effort into a modern way to sort through extremely dense feeds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not FOSS, but ad free and its been able to find the hidden RSS feeds for things OK. FeedDemon at: http://bradsoft.com/

Probably not what you are after, but maybe someone with a similar question.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What did you try to mean by, whatever the linguistic details. What are you talking about when you say linguistic details?

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments