this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2024
15 points (94.1% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
408 readers
61 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
'The forestry sector said the decision will mean millions of small trees which have been growing in nurseries ready for planting will have to be destroyed.'
This seems needlessly wasteful. Surely if they're going to be destroyed anyway you could give them away for free? There must be tree planting charities that could take advantage of a least some of these?
It depends in the value of the tree vs the cost to plant it. If the shortfall in funding mostly covers the cost to pay people to plant the trees then the charities will have to make up the shortfall in time or donations which may be impossible.
True enough. You're more than likely correct, it's still frustrating though.
Absolutely.