this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
569 points (96.3% liked)

AMUSING, INTERESTING, OUTRAGEOUS, or PROFOUND

764 readers
622 users here now

This is a page for anything that's amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

♦ ♦ ♦

RULES

① Each player gets six cards, except the player on the dealer's right, who gets seven.

② Posts, comments, and participants must be amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound.

③ This page uses Reverse Lemmy-Points™, or 'bad karma'. Please downvote all posts and comments.

④ Posts, comments, and participants that are not amusing, interesting, outrageous, or profound will be removed.

⑤ This is a non-smoking page. If you must smoke, please click away and come back later.

Please also abide by the instance rules.

♦ ♦ ♦

Can't get enough? Visit my blog.

♦ ♦ ♦

Please consider donating to Lemmy and Lemmy.World.

$5 a month is all they ask — an absurdly low price for a Lemmyverse of news, education, entertainment, and silly memes.

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Original link

If people aren't panicked, they wouldn't elect panic-pandering politicians, so there must always be a panic — crime, drugs, commies, libruls, etc.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Democrats are seen as ineffective on crime while republicans are seen as more effective on crime. Regardless of the truth.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Curious: are they not correlated?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Hahaha, 9/10 of the top 10 places with the highest murder rates are red. Try again though (and I don't even like defending dems, I'm a leftist...)

Edit: goes to show that police are innefective and more spending =/= less crime, moreover, a more policed state is a more paranoid, divided, and racialized state.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I asked a question

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)