this post was submitted on 03 Dec 2023
1288 points (91.6% liked)

Memes

45734 readers
368 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (12 children)

Look at spacex they are more efficient then nasa

[–] MostlyHarmless 0 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What do you base that on?

Spacex has had zero successful missions to Mars. NASA has landed 5 rovers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Well one metric would be cost per kg to get something into space. I also recall a lot of people dying when NASA first started going into space, of which SpaceX has not had any rockets explode with people in them, but I'm not impaired enough to make that false equivalence like you did with Mars.

[–] MostlyHarmless 0 points 11 months ago

Of course my comment is false equivalence, because the initial assertion is false equivalence.

You can't compare NASA and Spacex because they have different goals. NASA even contract many of their payloads to Spacex, which they wouldn't do if they were in the same business.

load more comments (9 replies)