this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

AMD

26 readers
1 users here now

For all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Radeon, Threadripper, EPYC, rumors, reviews, news and more.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

It's kinda weird, but actually GCN up to and including RDNA2 did work scheduling in hardware, including automatic context switches in case of a bubble, hazard or stall.

With RDNA3, this was changed to a compiler/driver based approach in favor of a simpler and smaller CU design. The tradeoff is increased driver complexity and higher CPU overhead - this is also how Nvidia has been handling things for ages now.

HAGS seems to mitigate the overhead to some extent, this probably works through the HW providing hints to the OS about when there's a good moment to switch tasks, such that the latter can set up memory transfers and other things needed slightly ahead of time and also doesn't need to mindlessly wait for the GPU to finish whatever it's doing, since in-flight Wavefronts aren't preemptible.

Anyhow, last time I looked at tests, the performance benefits were quite minimal (around 5% on a 2080ti in CPU limit)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I didn’t know that about RDNA3, thank you

load more comments (1 replies)