this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

48 readers
1 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

the article failed to mention the major drawbacks of aspheric glass lenses, namely:

  • weight

  • cost

  • massively increased pupil swim to the large population that is bothered by it.

this is why fresnel lenses were universally chosen for the first few sets if devices that weren't cheap insert-phone-vr.

this is why nearly every next-gen device is using pancake lenses.

and the only device (besides this one) that uses something better is vrgineer's xtal with parametrically computed optics... which is one reason those devices run $10k+... a set of these lenses is easily several kilobuck$ to make.

the varjo hmds do tend to use aspheric lenses, but compensate for pupil swim by eye/pupil tracking and adjusting the rendering... something the pimax crystal doesn't do (afaik).

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The pimax can do eye tracking for DFR so I’m surprised they don’t also adjust rendering to account for pupil swim.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

What is pupil swim?

load more comments (1 replies)