this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Main

139 readers
4 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (27 children)

I generally agree with you but just playing devil's advocate, I think Rashford used his voice and position well to make good effective change.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (13 children)

There's definitely positive examples yes. But by golly are they rare and mostly something we can only judge on the surface. Geniunely appreciate Rashys work a lot but I'm saddened he even has to do that level of advocating for such a no brainer

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (12 children)

Yeah you'd think starving children = bad is a fairly easy position for all of us to get behind.

But Tories gonna Tory.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Depends if you think it's the government's job to feed kids or their parents. 13 years of Labour government seemed to think it was the latter. As did Labour and SNP administrations in Wales and Scotland until they saw opportunities to look good.

load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)