Hardware

48 readers

5 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Single Threaded Performance vs Multi Threaded Performance; Which is more important in 2023? (alien.top)

submitted 11 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

57 comments fedilink hide all child comments

For much of the 2010s, we were stuck with mainly dual-core and quad-core CPUs in PCs. However the arrival of Ryzen shook the PC industry, causing a rapid increase in core counts. At the time, there was fervent discussion on this matter, with many questioning if more cores were worth it, and how many cores are more than enough?

So how do things stand today? The latest Intel and AMD consumer processors top out at 24 and 16 cores respectively. What extent of modern software can take advantage of all those cores? What modern workloads are still bottlenecked by single threaded performance?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

Gamer checking in. Single core performance is very important as games are not quite yet capable of taking advantage of say 12 cores compared to 6 higher performing cores.

It’s why the 5600x3d performs so closely to the 5800x3d while gaming despite it being a 6 core vs 8 core comparison. We encountered something similar a decade ago with i5 vs i7 for gaming games we’re not capable of taking full advantage of hyperthreading. But as time went on the gap between the two widened.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

As a gamer what do you think about Intel's E-cores? I have heard that E-cores are detrimental to gaming performance, with some gamers disabling them or instead opting for AMD CPUs.