Data Hoarder

24 readers

1 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 10 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Digitizing old family photos -- flatbed or auto-feed/top-load scanner? (alien.top)

submitted 10 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I want to digitize all of our family photos and I have boxes and boxes of old photos from the 1940s (parents' baby/early childhood photos) through today. Many of the photos are those square 3x3 prints from the mid '60s (parents' newlywed days) and '70s. Later photos are mostly 4x6 prints. Hundreds , maybe even thousands of them.

I've been reading up on photo scanners and am having trouble deciding on which one to get/use. The two that keep coming up on the good reviews lists are the Epson FastFoto (about $500) auto-feed model or the Epson v600 flatbed (about $330).

I have so many photos that I imagine it would take forever to scan them on a flatbed, but my concern about the FastFoto model is that the roller mechanism inside the machine might scratch or otherwise damage the photos. I've read many reviews on this model and about half of the users said they had no issues while the others said the roller mechanism left lines or scratches on their old photos.

Would it be possible to scan batches of photos on a flatbed to save time or would it end up taking just as long as doing them one by one? I just don't know which model to get.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

A few years ago I scanned in a lot of family photos. I did it over a few months. I used a Canon flat bed that also has a negative adapter and slide adapter. I organized the files in multiple folders that were in a folder named the year (I estimated some). I scanned them at the highest resolution. Some where from the late 1800s. Keep the originals, my aunt and uncle threw some of their originals away! I asked if their hard disk dies what will they do? 🤦

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

I scanned so I could get rid of the originals and save space. Just keep backups, one extra external and an offsite copy.

You could lose the originals and the hard drive in a small fire or flood too.

Only reason I would keep an original if its an important photo or if I thought the scan is not good enough and could be improved.