this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
2 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

33 readers
1 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (27 children)

I wonder why everyone holds AMDs display port 2.1 in such high regard. Its barely more bandwidth than hdmi 2.1 since its not the full UHBR20 80GBPS

its UHB13.5 at 54GBPS on RDNA 3 vs 48GBPS HDMI 2.1 on ADA GPUs

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

48 vs 54 is roughly 12.5% more bandwidth. In the PC hardware world, 12% isn't often considered very close.

That 12.5% increased bandwidth allows this 8k monitor, to be easily run at 240hz 10 bit color with DSC.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

That monitor theoretically supports it's full resolution and refresh rate over HDMI 2.1 too, the extra bandwidth isn't the difference maker.

Right now no cards seem to work with it at 240Hz over HDMI, but it's listed as supported on the monitors end.

load more comments (25 replies)