this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

Hardware

33 readers
1 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Intel's accelerator strategy and focus on memory bandwidth is paying off huge.

First time in awhile I've seen Intel execute something well and catch AMD with their pants down, despite sapphire rapids being a lemon in most respects.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Amd dc sales are taking off and intel is still struggling.

Spr is not a competitive product for the vast majority of workloads. Its fine here because who cares about the cpu performance. Cloud probably paying premium for bergamo chips, and you dont need a powerful 128 core here.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

This^

SPR is cheaper than Genoa and Bergamo, and supply of those EPYC chips has not been as abundant as SPR.

There's advantages to SPR over Zen 4 EPYC in ML/AI workloads, and while MI300X will be doing the grunt of the training and inference, some model weights/parameters could be offloaded to the CPU with minimal performance loss in the event the VRAM buffer overflows to system memory. CPU only inference could also tested for model performance on weaker hardware or be utilized if all MI300X are busy and there's unused CPU cycles (which is likely for these workloads). SPR generally outperforms Genoa in inference so there's some merits for its selection over the latter.

Regardless though this decision by Microsoft just boils down to cost and availability

load more comments (1 replies)