this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Hardware

47 readers
1 users here now

A place for quality hardware news, reviews, and intelligent discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (18 children)

Am I reading those Cuda core projections right?

GA102 to AD102 increased by about 80%, but the jump from Ad102 to GB202 is only slightly above 30%, aside from no large gains going to 3nm?

Might not turn out that impressive after all.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

You should be looking at transistor amount if anything at all, "cuda cores" is only somewhat useful when looking at different products within the same generation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Still very accurate if you know what to look for.

For example, the reason why Ampere vs Turing CUDA cores scale different will let you predict how an Ampere GPU scales vs Turing GPU.

It's also why we knew how Ada would scale linearly except with 4090 that was nerfed to be more efficient

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

I guess people don't dig into white papers to learn about how and why the architectures perform as they do

load more comments (15 replies)