Framework

76 readers

1 users here now

Discussion around the Framework mission of building products that last longer by making them upgradeable, customizable, and repairable. Consumer electronics can be better for you and for the environment.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

AMD interfaces, some clarification (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I'm going to get the DIY edition of the 13-inch, comparing AMD to Intel

The Intel variant doesn't appear to have any limitations - it seems that any expansion module can go in any slot, but for AMD it says

Supporting USB4/DP for upper left and right slots, USB 3.2/DP for lower right slot and USB 3.2 only for lower left slot, along with USB-C power input on all four slots

Looking at the forum posts, I'm still a bit confused.

If I'm using HDMI output to two external monitors which I'm going to be doing, can I still use any slot, or am I only limited to one HDMI output on the lower left slot only (and DP on another)?

I could go for Intel but it's the end of DDR4 and I'd quite like to be on DDR5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (7 children)

This graphic should be helpful:

https://knowledgebase.frame.work/en_us/expansion-card-functionality-on-framework-laptop-13-amd-ryzen-7040-series-SkrVx7gAh

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Pretty confusing. I hope next year's AMD has 4.0 on all four slots.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

this is an AMD issue and not a Framework issue, so that's not one they can fix unfortunately

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Couldn't AMD have it ready in time for next year? Or am I missing something

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

well they could, I'm just saying Framework has no control over it

load more comments (3 replies)