this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Main

139 readers
3 users here now

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (8 children)

But it was fine in the 70’s and 80’s when Liverpool were the richest team in England due to their owner.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (5 children)

It's hilarious seeing it. I hate city dominating but the are literally doing what United have done for 20 years under Sir Alex... Buy the best players and dominate the league.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I think people are more angry about where the money comes from (which wasn't an issue when Liverpool and United dominated respectively) and the fact that regardless of spending a lot of money, there is growing evidence that City have been ignoring the existing financial rules for years anyway

[–] [email protected] 1 points 10 months ago

Again, you’re not wrong. Where the money comes from is a valid, but in my opinion, separate argument from the money ruins football thing. As for the breaches, I agree, the rules may have been brought in by the current elite to limit competition or you may disagree with that. It’s irrelevant if the rules were in place and broken there should be punishments.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)