Data Hoarder

170 readers

1 users here now

We are digital librarians. Among us are represented the various reasons to keep data -- legal requirements, competitive requirements, uncertainty of permanence of cloud services, distaste for transmitting your data externally (e.g. government or corporate espionage), cultural and familial archivists, internet collapse preppers, and people who do it themselves so they're sure it's done right. Everyone has their reasons for curating the data they have decided to keep (either forever or For A Damn Long Time (tm) ). Along the way we have sought out like-minded individuals to exchange strategies, war stories, and cautionary tales of failures.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

WD drives. Do I really need to buy the NAS-specifix drive? (alien.top)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

5 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Hi. I'm in Australia and Amazon have both the 6TB WD Blue Desktop and WD NAS drives available, but the latter is 100 bucks more than the former (280 vs 190). They're both 5400rpm and have 256MB cache.

I run UnRAID at home, with the computer on 99% of the time. The drives are set to spin down after 15 minutes and I reckon at least a couple of my 8 drives spin up a handful of times a day.

What am I getting for that extra 100 bucks? What would I be missing out on if I bought the cheaper ones? I'd be thinking of buying 2 as one of them would be my new parity drive.

Thanks for any advice.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You should buy drives large enough to clear the "shitty SMR" zone without any penalty on price/TB (that's at least 8TB for WD and 10TB for Seagate). Other than that anything is fine, especially for unraid that treats the disks separately.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks!

load more comments (1 replies)