Intel
Rules
-
Be civil. Uncivil language, slurs, and insults will result in a ban. If you can't say something respectfully, don't say it at all.
-
No Unoriginal Sources, Referral links or Paywalled Articles.
-
All posts must be related to Intel or Intel products.
-
Give competitors' recommendations only where appropriate. If a user asks for Intel only (i.e. i5-12600k vs i5-13400?) recommendations, do not reply with non-Intel recommendations. Commenting on a build pic saying they should have gone AMD/Nvidia is also inappropriate, don't be rude. Let people enjoy things.
-
CPU Cooling problems: Just like 95C is normal for Ryzen, 100C is normal for Intel CPUs in many workloads. If you're worried about CPU temperatures, please look at reviews for the laptop or CPU cooler you're using.
view the rest of the comments
The high temps i'm sure can be mitigated with good cooling, but what about the high power consumption? Surely that's a strike against it.
The limits imposed by Intel are for competition: they are uncharacteristically high compared to Intel's established expectation. Up until recently, the i5 series was the best bang for buck (synth score/USD) but now it's a bit more convoluted.
If and when I move to a BIGlittle chip I'll be creating BIOS profiles with either all P or all E cores disabled depending on the task at hand. For each of those profiles I'll have an A and B set for each, one with turbo disabled and one with an optimal voltage/clock ratio laying +500MHz below max turbo. Always C-state enable these days as it's not like the 4K series when switching Cstates caused a noticeable lag when jumping from min to max.